The 6D Framework

Don't design a plan. Craft a strategy.

Designing a stock options strategy is not a legal exercise. It is a people's strategy exercise. Your own stock options design must flow from your values and vision. That is what gives it authenticity. That is what makes it yours.

If you don't find yourself leaving everything else aside and specifically contemplating only on this for long periods of time, alone and silently, then you are not doing it right.

The Just Esops 6D Stock Options Framework

Six dimensions.

When you start to design a stock options strategy, you need to consider six dimensions of your policy. Sometimes a few of these dimensions act like forces that run in opposite directions. Your job is to find the right balance — a balance that need not be the same as a very good friend's company, or another company that was recently successful. Don't imitate others. Your stock options design will flow from your own values and vision.

Dimension 01

Why

Past or Future. Or Both.

Reward the past, the future, or both? If early teammates carried you through hard years, honour that. We use Gracias Options for the past and Growth Options for the future. Gracias use friendlier terms; Growth looks ahead. Many teams need both—documented separately so the story stays clear.

Dimension 02

Who

Coverage with intention.

Should everyone get stock options, or only a few? This is not a math question. It's a culture question. Based on your values and vision — what kind of company do you want to build? Do the recipients have the maturity to appreciate what stock options mean? Understanding "if the company does well, I become rich" is not the same as appreciating the responsibility that ownership conveys. If someone is better motivated by immediate cash than a distant long-term reward, options may not be the right tool for them.

Dimension 03

How Many

Attractiveness, not percentages.

Forget standard percentages and industry templates. A certain number or percentage of options has no meaning per se — what really matters is their financial value relative to the recipient's earning capacity. We use the Intended Benefit Through Options (IBO) method to determine the right number of options for each recipient. If the pool is too small to give attractive grants to everyone, reduce coverage — don't hand out peanuts that motivate no one.

Dimension 04

What Price

The strike price is a statement.

Should your team board the bus at the current fair market value, or at a discount? If someone has been with you for two years and helped create value, should they get a discount? Should a new hire board at the current Fair Market Value or at a discount? These are the perspectives you need to balance. A deep discount can feel right, but it may carry accounting implications. There is no standard answer here. Only the right answer for your company, rooted in your values.

Dimension 05

What Conditions

Vesting is earned, not automatic.

Vesting has three elements: Period, Schedule, and Conditions. The most common is four years with a one-year cliff. But your vision may dictate three, five, or longer. Should they vest equally every year, or in a back-ended manner — 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%? Should they vest merely on the basis of tenure, or should certain performance conditions be met? Company-level milestones like revenue and users, or employee-level parameters. These conditions define what "earning" your options actually means and how you can exercise them.

Dimension 06

How Often

Rhythm over chaos.

Granting options to every new hire on their joining date becomes an administrative nightmare. A quarterly grant cycle is the rhythm most companies should follow. Whoever joins in April, May, or June receives their grant in July. The legal machinery — shareholder approvals, board resolutions — aligns naturally with quarterly board meetings. Clearly communicate this policy upfront. No surprises. No confusion. Just a disciplined, repeatable cadence.

You don't design a stock option strategy. You discover it.

When you follow this process and spend a lot of time thinking about it, you realize that your strategy reveals itself. Stock options have two key perspectives — emotional and financial. You address the emotional perspective by granting them to people who resonate with your values and vision, so they feel a sense of ownership.

But you also need to ensure that your stock options provide appropriate financial benefit. That is why the 6D framework exists — to ensure you are considering all aspects of the policy design.

Do not rush it. Take your time. But do it right.

Start the Conversation

Let us help you discover your stock options strategy.

The color of money is the same everywhere, but the color of values and vision differs with each company. Use your own color as a differentiator. Live your own story, not someone else's.

Talk to Us

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about the 6D framework

What is the 6D stock options framework?

It is a six-dimension framework for designing a stock options strategy: Why (reward the past, incentivise the future, or both), Who (coverage as a culture question), How Many (attractiveness via the IBO method, not arbitrary percentages), What Price (strike as a statement of fairness), What Conditions (vesting period, schedule, and milestones), and How Often (a disciplined grant cadence, typically quarterly).

Why does Just Esops say you discover a strategy, not design one?

When you spend long periods contemplating your values, vision, and people — alone and silently — your strategy reveals itself. It flows from who you are, not from what someone else did. Imitation produces hollow mechanics; contemplation produces authentic strategy.

What are Gracias Options and Growth Options?

Gracias Options reward past contribution with more favourable terms — recognising people who stayed through the hard years. Growth Options incentivise future performance. Bunching both together sends a muddled message; your scheme should separate and clearly communicate each intent.

What is the IBO method for sizing grants?

IBO stands for Intended Benefit Through Options. Instead of copying generic percentage benchmarks, you work backwards from the financial value the grant should represent relative to the recipient's earning capacity and their criticality to achieving your vision. If the pool is too small to give attractive grants to everyone, reduce coverage — don't hand out peanuts that motivate no one.

Should everyone in the company get stock options?

Coverage is a culture question, not only a math question. The framework asks whether recipients have the maturity to appreciate what ownership means, and whether options are the right motivator for that person — versus immediate cash compensation.

How should we think about strike price?

The strike price is a statement of fairness — it communicates who boarded the bus at what valuation and why. Whether you use FMV, a discount for tenure, or new-hire pricing reflects your values and carries accounting implications. There is no universal answer — only the right answer for your company.

Is four-year vesting with a one-year cliff always right?

It is common, but not universal. Vesting has three elements: period, schedule, and conditions. Your vision may call for three or five years. A back-loaded schedule (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) can reflect the reality that more value is created in later years. Conditions can be tenure-based or milestone-based. Your answer should follow your culture.

Why does Just Esops recommend a quarterly grant cycle?

Granting options on every individual's joining date creates administrative chaos. A quarterly rhythm batches approvals, aligns with typical board cadence, and sets clear expectations. Whoever joins in April, May, or June receives their grant in July. Communicate this upfront — no surprises.

Is ESOP design a legal exercise or a strategy exercise?

It is a people strategy exercise grounded in your values and vision. Legal execution matters, but the real work begins with going silent and contemplating your intent for long periods of time, alone. If you are not doing that, you are not designing your strategy — you are copying someone else's.